Blog

Each post is a discovery. IRDME is the method — the finding is the story. All results link to their pre-registered hash.

engineering#computational-geometry#csg#structural-law#hub-persistence#boundary-condition#bc3barXiv:2604.23639

Planetary Gear CSG Confirms the Law: Computational Geometry as a New Domain

A planetary gear assembly modeled as a CSG graph: r(structural ↔ CSG-operations) = 0.668, p = 0.042, Δr = 0.935. Pre-registered before running. Computational geometry via continuous CSG operations is now a confirmed domain. BC3b boundary defined.

engineering#boundary-condition#negative-correlation#cli-tools#hub-inversion#structural-lawarXiv:2604.23639

BC_INVERSION: Negative Correlation in cobra's Command Architecture

cobra (the Go CLI framework behind kubectl, Hugo, and dozens of major projects) produces r = −0.862 (p = 0.014). The declared hub is the least behaviorally active node. This is BC_INVERSION: fan-out with leaf clustering — and it is structurally distinct from BC_RADIAL.

engineering#boundary-condition#radial-architecture#cli-tools#structural-law#hub-collapsearXiv:2604.23639

BC_RADIAL: Why Radial Architectures Collapse Cross-Layer Correlation

docopt in Go, Java, and Rust all denied the Functional Proximity Law via the same mechanism. When a single hub fans out to all leaves, the behavioral layer's hub-rank vector approaches a constant — and Pearson r collapses toward zero. Named mechanism: BC_RADIAL.

engineering#ai-architecture#hub-shadow#transformer#llama#multilayer#pre-registered#confirmedarXiv:2604.23639

The Transformer Paradox: Historical Lineage vs Benchmark Dominance in AI Architecture

F6 pre-registered result: Transformer is the top hub by citation lineage and architectural inheritance, but LLaMA leads current benchmarks. Two layers, same 20 models — structurally divergent hubs reveal the gap between historical influence and contemporary relevance.

#bff4e101
engineering#github#structural-law#game-engines#databases#architecture#hub-persistencearXiv:2604.23639

Why Game Engines Confirm the Law and Databases Deny It

Godot scores r = 0.925. PostgreSQL scores r = -0.120. Both are large, mature, well-maintained open-source codebases. The difference is not code quality — it is governance and commit discipline.

engineering#github#hub-persistence#structural-law#open-source#communityarXiv:2604.23639

The IRDME Law Across 18 Open-Source Repositories

We ran the structural hub analyzer on 18 major GitHub repositories and stored every result publicly. 10 of 18 confirmed the IRDME structural law (r >= 0.3). The pattern splits cleanly by software category.